Many Different Kinds

Sweezus knocked on the door of the Camus family's apartment.

Sweezus! cried the twins. Come and play penguins!

Not now, said Sweezus. I'm starving. What's for breakfast?

Mini-Wheats, said Francine. The children don't much like them.

Oh, said Sweezus. Shall I help myself?

Please do, said Francine. I'll get the coffee.

Camus was at the table eating toast and strawberry jam.

Sweezus, he said, contemplatively. Why does your name seem so familiar?

Are you on Twitter? asked Sweezus. Perhaps you follow me.

Twitter? said Camus. I think not. I have no interest in the social media.

Don't knock it till you try it, said Sweezus. It helps me with my writing. I've just completed a creative writing course. My teacher encouraged me to tweet.

What do you tweet about? asked Camus.

The night sky, said Sweezus. It's really cool. No one else is doing it. One of my followers wrote and told me I ought to be a writter.

A writter? said Camus. What's a writter?

I assumed they meant a writer, said Sweezus. And they couldn't spell.

That's good, said Camus. It means you're making progress, when you start to get some feedback.

That's what I think, said Sweezus, but I just don't seem able to write this article for Marie and Belle et Bonne. A bicycle story I can do, but it's the philosophical aspect that's holding me up.

Aha, said Camus. Just write about what you know.

Yeah, exactly, said Sweezus. And philosophy isn't my thing.

There are many different kinds of philosophy, said Camus. Existentialism, absurdism, determinism, nihilism, naturalism, stoicism.......

You're kidding me! said Sweezus. Wow!

Velosophy 3 : Freewheel v. Determinism

Greetings fellow velosophers! Thanks for your wonderful response to our first 2 issues. Le Bon David here, with more cycling conundrums and paradoxes for you. Today I am going to address the big question of freewill versus determinism as it pertains to bicycling.

First I am going to talk in general terms about riding and then I shall examine the implications of falling off.

What could be a more apt metaphor to illustrate free will than the riding of a bicycle? We are free to start and stop at will, change our direction at will, wear whatever apparel we like, ride in the rain, travel over thorns, tinkle our bells, and shout rudely at people who do not get out of our way in time. And free wheeling is the ultimate example of freedom, for most of us. The pure joy of whizzing along without effort is without parallel.

But wait! Is this truly free will? Is not every single example I have given causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences? Sadly I think most of you would have to say Yes.

However, I put it to you that since the necessary connection between cause and effect can never be rationally justified, our belief in them must rest entirely upon our acquired habits.

What good news for those of us who are prone to tumble off occasionally! No one likes to think they have tumbled off of their own free will. Even less do we like to think we have tumbled off in a manner predetermined by an outside force or series of events. But SCEPTICISM informs us we have merely fallen off our bicycles from habitude.

That is all for this week, cycling friends! Please feel free to write in with thoughts and opinions on this and any other topics that interest you. Next week my friend the VeloDrone will pondering the topic of Nihilism. Do join us!