Pliny the Elder glanced across at my sketch of the two Beta Sigma Phi ladies.
A pity it's not in colour, he remarked. I would love to know the colour of the suiting of the one with golden shoes.
How funny you should say so, I replied. Because I happen to know that it was bright red.
Don't tell me you remember, said Pliny, surprised.
No, I looked at my old diary from November 2004, and found the entry for that day. It seems my notebook sketch was merely practice for a detailed colour sketch. It's funny, though....
What's funny?
In the diary, they're wearing hats.
What sort of hats?
I'll show you.
I went to find the diary. I found it. I brought it over to Pliny. I opened it. I showed him the ladies with the hats.
Why have you given them hats? asked Pliny. They didn't have hats in the notebook. Did they wear hats, or didn't they?
I really don't remember, I said. But let us be logical.
How? asked Pliny.
Let us look at the notebook again, I said, and determine whether what looks like hair could be hats.
I went to find the notebook. I found it. I brought it over to Pliny. I opened it. I showed him the ladies with the disputed head toppings.
That one, said Pliny, pointing to the tall one, is definitely not wearing a hat. Now let us examine the other one.
He peered closely at the other Beta Sigma Phi.
Her head ends in two distinct points, he concluded. I am willing to acknowledge that may suggest a hat.
Right, I said. Where does that leave us?
Monday, November 15, 2010
The Superiority of Colour
Labels:
Beta Sigma Phi,
bright red,
diary,
disputed head toppings,
golden shoes,
hats,
Notebook,
November 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment